9.30.2005

Tonight’s Lineup

On CNBC's "Kudlow & Company" tonight:

A market discussion with Barry James, President James Advantage Funds.

Christine Augustine, Bear Stearns retail analyst, to talk about consumer spending and the retail industry.

Craig Russell, Alaron Senior FX, to talk about the dollar.

Suncor Energy CEO Richard George, to talk about Canadian oil sands.

A Washington to Wall Street debate with author/columnist Ann Coulter and Julian Epstein, Democratic strategist.


TONIGHT’S POLL:

With Senators Frist and DeLay’s recent troubles, is there a GOP crackup in the making?

YES or NO?

ALERT: New CNBC/Kudlow & Company Website

When you get a moment, check out CNBC's new "Kudlow & Company" website at www.kudlowcnbc.com.

The convenient site brings together lots of valuable information regarding the show, as well as a number of interesting links to various blogs and websites.

It is also the place to vote on our nightly “Kudlow & Company” poll. Larry’s blog www.moneypolitics.net can be accessed here as well.

Feel free to add a link to your website.

Canadian Oil Sands

My thought on the so-called energy crisis is very simple.

Canadian oil sands are the solution to our energy problem. Reserves of this unconventional source are huge. Some geologists believe they may be greater than the conventional oil produced by Saudi Arabia.

The pessimistic oil peak crowd will be proven wrong by the development and distribution of these Canadian oil sands. The United States even has some of these same tar-sands in the Wyoming area. And, at $65 dollars for a barrel oil, oil sand production makes clear economic sense, as the break-even point is somewhere around $25 to $30 dollars a barrel.

This is a pro-growth solution to our oil problems and it will enormously reduce our dependence on Middle East, Saudi and OPEC oil.

In other words...it's a win, win, win.

9.29.2005

Tonight's Lineup

An international market discussion with Keith Wirtz, Chief Investment Officer, Fifth Third Asset Management.

John Baliotti, industrial analyst, Fulcrum Global Partners to talk about the conglomerates and the industry.

Senator Byron Dorgan (D-ND) will discuss the oil industry and excess profits tax.

Red Cavaney, President of The American Petroleum Institute, to address the excess profits tax.

Blogger Glenn Reynolds to talk about his "Porkbusters" website at www.truthlaidbear.com.

Senator Conrad Burns (R-MT) to discuss Katrina, reconstruction, and the highway bill.




TONIGHT'S POLL:


Should oil companies be subjected to a tax on their excess profits?

Yes or no.

ALERT: New CNBC/Kudlow & Company Website (www.kudlowcnbc.com)

When you get a moment, check out CNBC's new "Kudlow & Company" website. The convenient site brings together lots of valuable information regarding the show, as well as a number of interesting links to various blogs and websites.

It is also the place to vote on our nightly “Kudlow & Company” poll. Larry’s blog www.moneypolitics.net can be accessed here as well.

Feel free to add a link to your website.

9.28.2005

Shame on You Yahoo!

As much as things change over in red China, some things unfortunately still remain the same.

According to recent reports, Internet-giant Yahoo helped Chinese authorities convict a journalist by providing the government with detailed information that led to the journalist’s ten-year prison sentence. This information apparently enabled the Chinese government to link the journalist’s personal e-mail account with the specific message containing information treated as a “state secret” to the IP address of his computer.

Check out the story that is still flying under the radar screen.

Tonight's Lineup

A market discussion with Bob Millen, Portfolio Manager, Jenson Portfolios and Don Hodges, Hodges Fund Portfolio Manager.

Louisiana Senator David Vitter, to discuss the $250 billion hurricane disaster relief request.

An energy legislation debate with Robert Slaughter, President of National Petrochemical and Refiners Association and Phillip Clapp, President of the National Environmental Trust.

Cong. Tom DeLay's indictment with Dana Milbank, Washington Post columnist, and Terry Jeffrey, editor of Human Events.


TONIGHT’S POLL:

Should Louisiana receive $250 billion for Hurricane reconstruction?

Private Sector Lends a Hand

Check out this new private-sector hurricane relief organization called "Recruiters For Katrina."

RKR is a national group of experienced recruiters, staffing & HR professionals who have joined together in an all volunteer effort to help the people affected by Hurricane Katrina to find jobs.

RKR is reaching out via partnerships and the media to support victims in their job search by providing coaching, mentoring, job search support, resume writing assistance, job postings, permanent placement, temporary placement, and telecommuting opportunities.

Their website Recruiters for Katrina is in the process of being constructed. In the meantime, you can check out their temporary website.


For more information please call Courtney Campbell at 714.356.0439, or via email at courtney@grahamology.com

9.27.2005

Confidence-Inspiring

Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan gave an important speech today that reassured financial markets and laid out a philosophical policy course for the post-Greenspan era that is soon approaching.

Speaking to the National Association of Business Economists meeting in Chicago, Mr. Greenspan hailed the free market writings of economic philosopher Adam Smith, and he traced an historical timeline all the way to the eminent economist Joseph Schumpeter’s gales of creative destruction, also a paean to the merits of resilient capitalism.

Greenspan noted that the market model was sorely challenged during the Depression era of the 1930s, but he went on to say that the Soviet-style model of socialist central planning was ultimately discredited as it literally failed to deliver the goods. Surely he is sending a message to whoever his successor may be.

Indeed, it was awesome to hear any senior economic policymaker in the U.S. government argue in favor of the first principles of free market capitalism. Over and over, Mr. Greenspan’s speech emphasized the flexibility and resilience of the market economy, whose prices are free to fluctuate as they help allocate supply and demand resources.

Though Mr. Greenspan did not explicitly state this, stock markets immediately took his views as a forecast that the U.S. economy will weather the shocks of back-to-back hurricanes, just as they have weathered similar shocks over the past 25 years as the Reagan legacy of deregulation reopened the critical arteries of the U.S. economy for smooth, efficient, and prosperous blood flows.

Greenspan also argued that central bankers should not obsess about so-called bubbles for the simple reason that such developments cannot be properly defined nor accurately pinpointed. And again, he indicated that the free economy can absorb these and other shocks. In another optimistic point, Greenspan inferred that the current economy will absorb the shock of the Fed’s current monetary tightening cycle.

He argued that the deregulated market economy is a wealth-creator and a self-corrector in the face of adverse developments. He also opined that the recent era of capitalism helped foster “extraordinary gains in productivity growth spawned by technological change.” He also made a strong plea for continued expansion of free trade, saying that protectionism does not improve living standards for American workers.

Mr. Greenspan did not leave any hints about near-term monetary policy, but it is our current view that financial and commodity market indicators suggest no need for additional tightening moves. However, futures markets are discounting a 4 percent funds rate in December and a 4.25 percent rate next winter. We will wait and see.

Stock market prices gained over the course of Mr. Greenspan’s speech. It was an optimistic speech. It was confidence-inspiring speech. It was a leadership speech. And it surely was a speech providing guidance for his successor.

Bravo for Greenspan.

Tonight's Lineup

On CNBC's "Kudlow & Company" tonight:

A market discussion with Jason Trennert, Chief Investment Strategist with ISI and Frank Gannon, Portfolio Manager at AIG Sun America.

Countrywide Financial CEO Angelo Mozillo to talk about the housing market.

Senator Jim DeMint to discuss federal spending and Operation Offset.

Steve Moore, Wall Street Journal economics writer, and Robert Reich, former Secretary of Labor, will debate hurricane relief spending.


TONIGHT'S POLL:

Would you give up some of your state's highway spending to offset the cost of Rita and Katrina?

Yes or No?

Porkbusters

Great website from our friend Glenn Reynolds regarding budget pork.

When is Congress going to take some real action and get serious about controlling spending? If they don’t, the tax cuts may be jeopardized. There are some real whoppers in the Reynolds list.

We thought the GOP stood for lower taxes AND lower spending. That was the Reagan vision, so where’s the follow-through?

9.26.2005

Less is More

In our brave new world of Katrina and Rita, several new facts of economic life come to mind. First, there are going to be a lot more hurricanes. Second, energy prices will stay relatively high. Third, the nation will spend a fortune on rebuilding hurricane damages.

Now, the question is, with all the federal and private money going into rebuilding, will there be enough private capital for new economic investment. Or will we simply spend our resources maintaining a level of old investment. Without new investing, our economy's potential to grow may slow. The way to overcome this is to maximize incentives for private risk taking and capital formation that will cover both hurricane rebuilding and brand new national economic investment.

To encourage private capital suppliers, we must minimize the tax bite on saving, investing and risk taking. Whether it's capital gains, or dividends, or energy profits or any other profits for that matter, we must tax them less in order to encourage private capital and entrepreneurship. A new world of hurricane proliferation makes this even more important than usual.

Tonight's Lineup

On CNBC's "Kudlow & Company" tonight:

A market discussion with Brian Rogers, Portfolio Manager of T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund and Michael Kahn, Barron's Tecnical Analyst.

Senator Jon Kyl to talk about hurricane spending and relief efforts.

Gerry Bell, lead meteorologist from the Federal National Hurricane Center.

Chris Edmonds, Director of Research at Pritchard Capital and John Kilduff, Energy Analyst at Fimat USA, to discuss Texas/Louisiana oil and natural gas production.


TONIGHT'S POLL:

Should the military take the lead in search and rescue missions, including hurricane disasters?

Yes or No?

Was Jevons Right?

Here’s a very interesting analysis of the link between hurricanes and economic activity by our friend, John Ryding of Bear Stearns. More hurricanes are coming and more damage will result from them. Note particularly the work of Professor William Gray at Colorado State University. Expect more government spending for hurricane damage. This is important food for thought.

“Was Jevons Right?”

There is an old joke that God created economists to make weather forecasters look good by comparison. These days, it seems, we all have to be weather forecasters and climatologists just to trade the bond market! The bond market and prices of energy products moved with each revision of Hurricane Rita’s track and, as if to underscore the heights of our weather-related obsession, CNBC runs a thermal image of Rita on the bottom right of the screen, just above the quotes for the stock indexes and bond market yields. The British by repute spend a lot of time talking about the weather and the nineteenth century English economist William Stanley Jevons built a business cycle theory around it—or more precisely built a theory around the weather on the sun! As our readers know, we love classical economists and Stanley Jevons (as he preferred to be called) is yet another whose ideas might need to be dusted off. His theory (he first published on this in 1875) linked sunspots to the weather and, in a much more agrarian economy than we currently have, from the weather to crop production and thus economic growth. Now, there are those who have linked sunspot cycles (which have a cycle of 11 years) with hurricane activity (for example, Jill Hasling and John Freeman—ironically of the weather research center in Houston, Texas—published a paper in December 1993 on The Prediction of Tropical Cyclones or No Tropical Cyclones by Means of the Solar Cyclone Strike Index). There are others, most notably William Gray (Professor of Atmospheric Science at Colorado State University), who see longer cycles in hurricane activity related to the temperature of the Atlantic Ocean and the behavior of the Gulf Stream. In a National Geographic article last month (i.e. pre-Katrina), Professor Gray said, “The whole East Coast was very lucky for the past 30 or 40 years . . . if we see a return to the type of landfall activity we saw in the thirties, forties, and fifties—no way but that economic losses will double, triple, quadruple, or worse.” (By the way, his theories have nothing to do with global warming for those who want to link man’s behavior back to climate change).

Interested readers can find Professor Gray’s hurricane forecasts on line (see http://hurricane.atmos.colostate.edu/Forecasts/). His September 2 forecast had a chilling summary, which read, “Following a record amount of June-July tropical cyclone activity and an active August in which Hurricane Katrina caused the greatest economic loss ever inflicted by a hurricane on the United States, we are continuing the bad news by predicting above-average activity for September and October. This year should be one of the most active and is already the most destructive hurricane season on record.” Once again, with Hurricane Rita bearing down on the Texas-Louisiana border as we write, his forecast appears to have proved remarkably accurate (although we are thankful that the latest news has the storm weakening to a category three as it approaches land). Climate records suggest that the upswing in hurricane activity began in 1995 and, if past cycles repeat themselves, this upswing could continue for a number of years. The implication of this is that we have to start thinking about the potential impact on the economy and economic policies from this naturally occurring hurricane cycle (presuming it exists).

The most obvious implication is the increased cost of property damage that is likely to occur in Florida and the Gulf States. This represents an increased rate of depreciation of buildings in the south and, therefore, a likely greater contribution to growth from construction spending due to increased rebuilding. In turn, this is likely to have implications for both insurance payouts and rates, and also for federal government spending. The response to Hurricane Katrina sets the precedent for the federal government response to other disasters and, therefore, we are likely to see higher levels of government spending and borrowing. Presumably an extended period of higher hurricane activity is likely to result in increased spending on retrofitting existing buildings, bridges, and other structures to withstand stronger wind forces. New construction may be more expensive as it is built to new hurricane codes. Vulnerable areas, such as New Orleans, are likely to be protected by more secure (and thus expensive) levees. Thoughts may turn to how to protect the vital energy infrastructure (especially refineries) to make them capable of withstanding stronger or more frequent hurricanes. Energy prices might remain higher than would otherwise be the case because of potential supply disruptions, and the increased costs associated with protecting energy production facilities from storms. Inland properties may rise in value relative to coastal properties as some people seek to move out of harm’s way.

9.23.2005

A Rough & Dirty Back of the Envelope Economic Forecast

The city of Houston is roughly 2% of GDP, or $250 billion.

Louisiana and Mississippi together are also about 2% of GDP.

Now, if we lose 50% of the output in Louisiana and Mississippi for the month of September, and if we lose all of Houston for one week - not likely but call it worst case - then on an annual basis for the third quarter of 2005, Houston loses three-quarters of a percent and Louisiana and Mississippi will cause a loss of one and a quarter percent. That means in total, a hurricane loss of roughly 2% of GDP at an annual rate. Subtract that from a 3% growth baseline and you're left with a 1% growth rate for the Q3 hurricane quarter.

Now remember folks, this is rough and dirty. But there's something to it. We will begin to recoup these losses in Q4 and of course we'll see a big reconstruction growth spurt in the first half of next year.

Tonight’s Lineup

On CNBC’s “Kudlow & Company” tonight:

Chris Edmonds, Director of Research at Pritchard Capital, Bob Slaughter from the National Petrochemical & Refiners Association, and Rayolla Dougher, from the American Petroleum Institute to discuss the impact of hurricanes on the oil industry.

A market discussion with Mike Holland of Holland & Company.

Star Parker, columnist and President of CURE (Coalition of Urban Renewal and Education) and Julian Epstein, Democratic strategist, to debate big government versus free enterprise zones.


TONIGHT’S POLL:

Compared to Hurricane Katrina, how would you rate the government’s emergency response to Rita?

Excellent?

Fair?

Poor?

9.22.2005

Tonight's Lineup

On CNBC's "Kudlow & Company" tonight:

A market discussion with Elaine Garzarelli, President of Garzarelli Research and Steve Bauer, CEO of Truffle Hound Capital.

Chris Edmonds, Research Director at Pritchard Capital Partners to talk about oil and energy.

Senator John Sununu and Congressman Bobby Jindal to discuss Katrina recovery and the Operation Offset proposal.

Richard Dobbs, London Director of McKinsey & Company, to talk about dividends versus share buybacks.

TONIGHT'S POLL:

As an investor, would you prefer larger dividend payouts or share buybacks?

Larger dividends
or
share buybacks?

Bush's Smart Strategies

Two fascinating articles on blog sites today:

One from the American Thinker which argues that Bush’s Katrina strategy, including the big spending, is a very shrewd move.

Another fascinating article from RedState.org argues that Bush’s financing strategy is also a shrewd move. This one, written by Nick Danger, argues the following:

“I will suggest that President Bush understands money better than any President we have ever had. He understands it better than most economists. He understands it better than our illustrious pundits. President Bush understands money the way a financier understands money.”

Both of these articles are courtesy of RealClear Politics. These essays are must-reads. They are completely counter-conventional. And I agree with them.

9.21.2005

Fed's End?

Incredibly, the 91 Day Treasury Bill dropped 21 basis points to 3.38 percent.

That is so far below the 3.75 percent fed funds rate, you can't hardly see it.

It could well be that this is signaling an end to Fed tightening.

Senator Kennedy is Wrong

The President today spoke of the many states that have accepted students from displaced Gulf Coast families into their schools. And then he said this:

The President wants to help public school students, but also wants to help 60,000 students who were attending private and parochial schools in the Gulf Coast area who choose to attend similar schools upon relocating.

Roughly 50,000 children in Louisiana who attended Catholic schools were displaced by Katrina and many are being taken in by Catholic schools in neighboring communities and states.

But some politicians, most especially Senator Edward Kennedy, object. He calls it a politically charged approach.

Numerous religious groups, however, including Catholic and Jewish organizations, strongly object to Mr. Kennedy's objection. They call it religious discrimination. I agree with them.

School vouchers for this purpose are absolutely necessary.

And by the way, in New Orleans itself, school vouchers will serve a useful purpose. Give the kids and their parents some choice.

Public education in New Orleans is a shambles, with a dysfunctional school board, four superintendents in as many years, and test scores in the basement.

It's a poverty trap that should be remedied. Let students take ownership of their own education, just as low-income hurricane victims should take ownership of housing and unemployed should have ownership of their job searches.

With all due respect, Mr. Kennedy is wrong.

Tonight's Lineup

On CNBC's "Kudlow & Company" tonight:

A market discussion with Dan Genter, CEO/CIO Genter Capital Management and Barbara Marcin, portfolio manager Gabelli Blue Chip Value Fund.

Congressman Jeff Flake to talk about his Operation Offset spending cut proposal.

James Tisch, CEO of Loews Corporation, defending capitalism.


TONIGHT'S POLL:

Following Hurricane Katrina, gas prices have spiked up. Is it due to:

Price gouging?

Free market capitalism?

No New New Deal

OMB Director Josh Bolten told us last night on CNBC’s Kudlow & Company that the administration is coming up with a new spending cut package.

First, they will resubmit last winter’s budget. This included $26 billion in domestic discretionary cuts and $65 billion of entitlement savings from slower spending growth rates. Congress so far is only giving the White House about a third of that package. So the battle will be joined. Additionally, Bolten is pulling together a new package of additional budget spending cuts to be revealed in a few weeks time. He implied that they may buck Congress. Is there veto bait here?

Today the Mike Pence-Jeff Flake conservative Republican Study Group House members presented their Operation Offset spending cut package. They are proposing a $70.7 billion package of cuts for 2006, cumulating to $193 billion over five years and $509 billion over ten years. This is very good.

Presumably, the capital gains and dividend tax cut extenders in the budget reconciliation bill will be maintained. Bolton was clear on this. Unfortunately, the death tax repeal and permanent tax cut idea are off the table for now. But the Bushies are opposed to any tax hike package to attempt to offset Katrina spending. Tax cut extenders would be fine right now.

Part of the stock market jitters can be traced to Washington uncertainties about tax and spending cuts. Of course, we are looking for clarification signs wherever they may pop up. Jeff Flake is coming on the show tonight. Stay tuned for more.

Katrina Recovery

Two excellent articles on the need for tax-free and regulatory-free enterprise zones for Katrina economic recovery:

First, from the father of enterprise zones, Jack Kemp.

Second, from my old comrade in arms Richard Rahn.

9.20.2005

A Great Idea for My Liberal Friends

I've got a great idea for my liberal friends who want to raise tax revenues to offset emergency Katrina spending. How about this:

Make additional reductions in the tax rate on capital gains and dividends. You want to make the wealthy make more? Want to make the investor class pony up more? This is the way to do it.

Since Bush cut tax rates on capital, revenues have surged. We're running at over 30% year on year. When Bill Clinton cut the capital gains tax rate, tax collections soared from $44 billion in 1995 to $127 billion in 2000.

But when congress raised the capital gains tax in 1986, collections dropped from $53 billion to $25 billion 5 years later.

Tax something less and you get more of it.

Investment tax rates are particularly sensitive.

Investment behavior is particularly responsive.

So that's my plan to help fund Katrina. Reduce investment tax rates, and tax revenue collections will soar even more.

Tonight's Lineup

On CNBC's "Kudlow & Company" tonight:

A market discussion with Jeff Matthews, General Partner at Ram Partners, and Wendall Perkins, Chief Investment Officer at Johnson Asset Management.

Josh Bolten, White House Director of the Office of Management and Budget, to discuss how to pay for Katrina, taxes, deficit, et al.

A Fed debate with Michael Darda, Chief Economist at MKM Partners.

Mike Churchill, President Churchill Research, to talk about commodity prices.


TONIGHT'S POLL:

Did the Fed do the right thing today?

Yes or no?

"Do No Harm"

Check out my latest column at NRO as a preview to today's FOMC meeting.

9.19.2005

Tonight's Lineup

On CNBC's "Kudlow & Company":

Market discussion with Dr. Robert Froelich, Scudder Investment's chief investment strategist.

Senator Chuck Grassley to talk about the Senate tax relief package for individuals affected by Hurricane Katrina, the Gulf opportunity zone, and the nomination of a spending czar.

David Malpass (Bear Stearns chief global economist), John Fund (Wall Street Journal columnist) and Roger Kubarych (HVB Group senior economic advisor) to discuss the German election.

Robert McTeer and Wayne Angell, both former Fed governors, to preview tomorrow's Federal Open Market Committee meeting.


TONIGHT'S POLL:

WITH INCONCLUSIVE ELECTION RESULTS, IS GERMAN ECONOMIC REFORM DEAD?

YES or NO?

9.17.2005

Money and Taxes

It's hard to find excess liquidity in the latest monetary stats from the St. Louis Fed, even though rising gold is hinting at growing inflation risk. The monetary base controlled by the central bank is rising by a 2.7% annual rate over the past six months. On the demand side, MZM is up only 1.8% annually, while M2 is gaining at a 2.9% pace. Hence the M's are reasonably low and balanced. When money supplied by the Fed is consistently higher than money demanded by the economy and financial markets, then inflation risk and interest rates are expected to escalate. But this appears not to be the case.
Hence the gold rally is puzzling, though it may be significant. At around $460, gold is at the top end of its year-long range.
More significant is Pres. Bush's decision to use pro-growth enterprise zones to rebuild New Orleans and the Gulf Coast, thereby taking a page from supply-sider Jack Kemp's playbook. Also, the President firmly ruled out higher taxes to fund Katrina recovery efforts. This includes the tax-cut extenders for dividends and capital gains, which will be included in the 2006 budget to be voted on in a month or so.
Sensing a positive outlook for economic growth, stock markets rallied across-the-board on Friday. After Bush's no new taxes press conference (with Vladimir Putin ) around 3:00 PM Friday,stocks rallied again in the final hour. Since August 26, the major indexes are up by roughly 2%, a sign of post-Katrina confidence in the future health of the economy.
Low tax-rates tend to bolster investment demand and economic growth. In monetary terms, this suggests even more goods to absorb the stock of money, holding back price increases. Usually, lower tax-rates are inimical to rising gold or other signals of inflation risk.
Though Treasury bonds have moved back to around 4.25%, they have been range-bound for years. The curve has widened comfortably,to about 75 basis points, consistent with economic growth. There is no true inflation warning in any of this. Even the dollar strengthened Friday after the President's tax update.
Perhaps the Fed has one more rate hike to 3.75% this week; hopefully it will be their last.

9.16.2005

Tonight's Lineup

On CNBC's "Kudlow & Company" tonight:

Washington to Wall Street discussion with Sen. Kit Bond, John Lineman (T. Rowe Price Portfolio Manager), and Noah Blackstein (Portfolio Manager with Dynamic Mutual Funds).

David Goode, CEO of Norfolk Southern to discuss the railroad industry and repairing the Gulf Coast region.

Jack Kemp to talk about Bush's speech, Gulf Opportunity Zones, and the homestead ownership initiative.

TONIGHT'S POLL:

In an earlier poll, 67 percent said a private business person should oversee Katrina relief spending. Do you think there is enough private enterprise in the President's Gulf Opportunity Zone plan?

Yes or No?

Opportunity Zone

President Bush’s Katrina recovery speech last night talked about a Gulf opportunity zone to spur economic growth that sounds an awful lot like Jack Kemp’s enterprise zone plan.

Reading the White House fact sheet that accompanied the President’s address, it says that the GO zone will provide tax relief and loans for businesses and entrepreneurs to invest in the region and create jobs. The GO zone will double small business expensing from $100,000 to $200,000 for investments in new equipment, provide a 50 percent bonus depreciation for all businesses and extend tax relief to the building of new structures. The GO zone will also make available loans and loan guarantees for small businesses, including minority-owned enterprises. “It is this entrepreneurship that will create jobs and opportunity and help brake the cycle of poverty.”

Also, the President proposed an urban homesteading initiative whereby evacuees can occupy a government-owned home with a favorable mortgage rate in exchange for their personal investment of sweat equity in the property. This will create homeownership, which is central to the revival of the area. Building sites to low income citizens will be given free of charge through a lottery.

So while Congress will flesh out the legislative details, it looks like private capital formation, business creation, and homeownership are key free enterprise approaches chosen by Mr. Bush to revive the Gulf Coast. This is very good. Perhaps Congress will waive any capital gains tax burdens to further attract capital. But certainly Bush has chosen not to create a new New Deal or a new WPA. There will be a lot of federal spending, but there will also be a large private sector component to the recovery plan.

White House sources also continue to state on background that they will insist on extending the capital gains and dividend tax cuts when the budget reconciliation bill is taken up later next month. This is also to the good. All things equal, stock markets should respond well to this news. There is still the issue of spending offsets to the huge Katrina budget increase, but at least there is a growing chorus in Congress to take a look at this. In the short-run the deficit for 2006 will expand, but the economy can absorb that with the right growth incentives and some longer-term spending discipline. It is also likely that some kind of spending czar such as proposed by Senator Jeff Sessions and Senator Judd Gregg will eventually be appointed. Another good idea.

All in all, the President’s speech last night was a good one. Delivered in his usual plain-speaking manner, it had positive economic growth solutions and an optimistic view of the longer-run. Good for Mr. Bush.

9.15.2005

Condi Rice

Today I attended an NBC News luncheon with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. She had some interesting points that I thought I would pass along.

On the Katrina hurricane disaster: She felt it uncovered much poverty still left in the south, a legacy of Jim Crow. She emphasized the need for education, as well as job opportunities. And suggested a faith-based approach through the churches as one answer.

On Iraq: Ms. Rice believes last January's elections were a turning point. She also noted that voter registration for the new elections is rising to a staggering 15 million people. She rejected Vietnam analogies. Believes strongly in the democracy beachheads in Afghanistan and Iraq as antidotes to terrorism. And reiterated that the President is not influenced by short run poll numbers.

She mentioned that Iran is increasingly isolated. And noted that it is French Prime Minister Devilepin who is threatening to take Iran to the UN Security Council over nuclear weapons development and proliferation.

She also emphasized the President's commitment to worldwide free trade and said she would continue to make that case.

Coming back home, Ms. Rice maintained that the Department of Homeland Security learned enormously from 9/11 and has excellent links with state and local security organizations. Potential responses to terrorism are well structured. But that it hasn't yet translated to natural disasters. That is what they are working on.

I found Ms. Rice to be resolute, factual, and clearly comfortable in defending both her and administration principles. It was an honor to attend the luncheon.

Tonight's Lineup

On CNBC's "Kudlow & Company" tonight:

Micki Maynard, New York Times business reporter, to talk about the airline industry and bankrupt Delta and Northwest.

Chris Edmonds, director of research at Pritchard Capital Partners, and John Kilduff, energy analyst at Fimat USA, to discuss the black-gold rush in Canada.

Jeff Harte, managing director at Sandler O'Neill to talk about brokerage stocks.

Cong. Todd Tiahrt and Senator Tom Coburn to preview Bush's speech, post-Katrina initiatives, and the Congressional agenda.


Tonight's Poll:

Should the government help bail out bankrupt airlines such as Delta and Northwest?

YES OR NO?

Objective

With the release of the August CPI, it's clear that the core reading is tame and well-contained at 2.1 percent over the past twelve months and 1.4 percent over the past three months at an annualized rate. The CPI less energy over the past year is 2.2 percent.

The more accurate CPI gauge is the chained CPI, or the Boskin CPI, which is 3.0 percent overall for the past year but only 1.8 percent on a core basis, roughly the same rate that has prevailed over the past ten months.

These readings suggest the absence of excess money from the Fed as a result of their restraining actions going back to June, 2004. All to the good.

However, we are keeping an eye on gold. In the spot market, the yellow metal opened this morning at $454, up another $3.50. Its recent peak was $456 last December. The December futures contract this morning is $457.50. Last December 3rd was a contract high of $469.30.

Those December readings did not foreshadow a breakout of core inflation. However, should gold break out of its trading range in the run-up to the Fed meeting next Tuesday it could signal an inflationary warning of excess liquidity that would warrant a 3.75 percent fed funds rate.

We have been campaigning against additional Fed rate hikes, but one must be objective and consistent. Right now the gold price rule approach is on the margin of the Fed call. A 4.18 percent Treasury bond, however, does not signal inflation worries.

9.14.2005

Strong for Roberts

Judge Roberts told Sen. Schumer and the Judiciary Committee that his favorite movies were " North by Northwest" and "Dr. Zhivago". Right on. Only one he missed was "Chariots of Fire." So I'm still strong for the soon-to-be chief justice. Who, by the way, is politically helping Pres. Bush get through the Katrina ordeal.

Tonight's Lineup

On CNBC's "Kudlow & Company" tonight:

Treasury Secretary John Snow to talk about the post-Katrina economy and supply-side tax incentives.

Democratic Senator Kent Conrad will respond to Secretary Snow's remarks.

Washington to Wall Street issues such as the Fed, budget deficit, taxes, and the effects of Katrina will be discussed by a panel including:

Tony Blankley, editorial page editor of the Washington Times
John Myers, CEO of GE Investments
John Augustine, CIS of Fifth Third Asset Management

Tonight's poll:

Should the Fed take a "compassionate" pause in their tightening campaign next week?

Yes or No.

9.13.2005

Tonight's Lineup

On CNBC's "Kudlow & Company" tonight:

Market discussion with Rob Morgan, senior vice president of Janney Montgomery Scott, and Robert Zagunis, principal of Jensen Investment Management.

Bob Toll, CEO of Toll Brothers, to talk about the homebuilding industry.

Bob Costello, chief economist of the American Trucking Association to discuss the trucking industry in the wake of Katrina, oil prices, et al.

Congressman Dennis Cardoza to talk about the Congressional agenda and new priorities following Hurricane Katrina.

Today's CNBC POLL question is:

What will best rebuild the Gulf Coast economy?

-- A government run New Deal-style program

-- Tax-free enterprise zones.

No new New Deal

Here is an excerpt from David Pace’s AP column from September 12, 2005:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency normally would oversee reconstruction efforts after a hurricane. But the agency's slow initial response to Katrina and the unprecedented devastation make it more likely that lawmakers will look elsewhere.
"Former approaches may not work in this set of circumstances," said Rep. Jim McCrery, R-La. "We may have to think outside the box. We may want to create some overarching entity to direct the efforts."
McCrery said there almost certainly will be some type of jobs program for hurricane victims that is patterned after the New Deal's WPA.
"I think that's going to happen," he said. "The plan is to create temporary jobs for the cleanup and getting locations ready for reconstruction and rebuilding. And then, even in the rebuilding process, there may be jobs created with a preference given to displaced persons from those areas."


But . . .
Republican Jim McCrery wants to bring back the WPA. No, no. no.

To quote John Fund of the Wall Street Journal – “where’s the Republican wing of the Republican Party?

Jack Kemp’s tax-free enterprise zones are the answer, not the WPA.

Dumb Ideas

Market held the high ground yesterday in what has become a 3 percent advance during the Katrina hurricane period. Small caps are up almost 5 percent. As I have been suggesting, it's a sign of confidence in the future of the U.S. economy. So far the market has shruggged off some inane, stupid, anti-growth, anti-capitalist ideas from that fount of wisdom called the U.S. Congress.

These dumb ideas include heavy over-spending, higher tax-rates, gasoline price controls, and excess profits tax on oil companies. And that's just the beginning. Hopefully, the stock markets in their wisdom believe that none of these policy blunders will come to pass.

My friend, John Fund from the Wall Street Journal, asks whatever happened to the Republican wing of the Republican Party? Good question. Economist Michael Darda calls it "the nattering nabobs of neo-Keynesian nonsense". Well put.

9.12.2005

No new New Deal

I am concerned that a $200 billion recovery package, using FEMA as the flywheel, is an alarming economic policy development. Providing temporary income assistance to displaced hurricane victims is a correct function for government. So is financial assistance for infrastructure repair purposes, though this responsibility should be distributed among local, state, and federal governments.

But rebuilding businesses and the private sector in affected states like Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama should be left to the free enterprise private sector. That is why Jack Kemp’s idea for a tax-free enterprise or empowerment zone is a good one.

I do not believe it is time for a new New Deal. FDR’s brand of 1930’s socialism never worked. All those alphabet agencies -- NRA, WPA, AAA, CCC -- were an attempt to politicize the economy through statist central planning. Many of these state-run agencies were declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. But the proof of the pudding is in the eating and the eating was economically unhealthy.

According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics between 1931 and 1940 the average unemployment rate was 18.8 percent. As late as 1939, unemployment was still 17.2 percent. Not until World War II production geared up -- along with new pro-business policies -- did unemployment drop sharply. This is why I do not want a new New Deal or a new Gosplan. Free market capitalism will empower the Gulf Coast to rapid recovery. State planning will merely prolong the misery.

Tonight's Lineup

On CNBC's "Kudlow & Company" tonight:

A market discussion with Janna Sampson, OakBrook Investments portfolio manager, and Mike Holland, president of Holland & Co.

Senator Jeff Sessions update on Katrina relief efforts and John Robert's nomination

David Malpass, Bear Stearns chief global economist, and Roger Kubarych, senior economic advisor at HVB Americas Group, to talk about the Japan election and investing in Japan.

9.09.2005

Jeremy Siegel and Manley Johnson?

Monetary trends are pointing to a mild slowdown in the growth rate of money GDP, but inflation risk is well contained. It’s a healthy monetary story.

In order to make some sense of the key money supply numbers, we use a 36-month smoothing technique in order to clarify the major trends. We also use the same for calculating the velocity, or turnover rate, of money.

The results show some very clear trends. First, on the demand side for the use of money, the slower growth in MZM and M2 is partially offset by a faster hand-to-hand turnover of money since the middle of 2003. This implies a growth rate of roughly 5.5 percent for nominal GDP.

Over the past couple of years nominal GDP has grown at around 6.5 percent annually. So it’s possible that future GDP growth will slow by about a percentage point.

As for the supply of money, which is controlled and created by the Fed, a clear slowdown has taken place since the mid-2004 restraining policies were first initiated. That, coupled with rising investment demands in part fueled by lower tax-rates on capital, has worked to remove the excess money printed by the central bank in 2002 and 2003.

Consequently, real time inflation-sensitive market price indicators are reflecting a rollback of inflation risk. As we have often noted, the Treasury yield curve has flattened, bond rates are historically low at just above 4 percent, spot commodity prices (excluding oil and gold) have been flat for almost 16 months, the gold price has been trading in a narrow range, and the dollar has stabilized.

Fed liquidity draining has also contained the energy spike impact so that core inflation remains around 2 percent or slightly less.

Though I wish the Fed would add or drain reserves with a sharp eye on financial and commodity prices, instead of the overnight fed funds rate, the fact remains that the monetary authority has thus far done a pretty good job in maintaining monetary balance and domestic price stability.

Now would be a good time for the government bank to come up for air, take a breather, and assess the results of their policy restraint by taking the next six months off.

One final word on the interaction of monetary and fiscal policies. Supply-side tax cuts over two years have increased the demand for money (and economic growth). Fed restraining actions have reduced the growth of money supplied. Therefore, inflation risk has been minimized.

Can the Fed avoid the mistakes of the past and not over-tighten? Will lower tax-rates remain in place? Those are the challenges. Let’s wait and see.

There is uncertainty over Mr. Greenspan’s successor. May I make two suggestions? Penn Professor Jeremy Siegel and former Fed vice chair Manley Johnson. Johnson wrote the book on the commodity price rule. Siegel also carefully monitors financial and commodity indicators of inflation. Both have academic and financial market experience. For those looking for new names for the post-Greenspan period, these candidates would make excellent choices.

Tonight's Lineup

On CNBC's "Kudlow & Company" tonight:

Former California Governor Pete Wilson to talk about the Gulf Coast's reconstruction efforts.

Market discussion with Steve Forbes and Michael Chren, portfolio manager Allegiant Large Cap Value Fund.

Bill Zollars, CEO of Yellow Roadway, to talk about earnings, guidance, and the trucking industry.

Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison and Congressman Jeff Flake to discuss the Katrina emergency supplemental bill.

9.08.2005

Tonight's Lineup

On CNBC's "Kudlow & Company" tonight:


Jack Kemp to talk about making the Gulf Coast into a tax-free enterprise zone.

A market discussion with Mike Holland of Holland and Co., and Lawrence Weissman, chief investment strategist with Ladenburg Thalmann.

Micki Maynard, New York Times business reporter, to talk about airlines and jet fuel costs.

Joe Kilduff, energy analyst with Fimat USA and Chris Edmonds, Director of Research at Pritchard Capital Partners (New Orleans-based energy investment firm) to talk about oil.

No new New Deal

Last night on CNBC’s “Kudlow & Company” I expressed concern that a $200 billion recovery package, using FEMA as the flywheel, was an alarming economic policy development. Providing temporary income assistance to displaced hurricane victims is a correct function for government. So is financial assistance for infrastructure repair purposes, though this responsibility should be distributed among local, state, and federal governments.

But rebuilding businesses and the private sector in affected states like Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama should be left to the free enterprise private sector. That is why Jack Kemp’s idea for a tax-free enterprise or empowerment zone is a good one.

I do not believe it is time for a new New Deal. FDR’s brand of 1930’s socialism never worked. All those alphabet agencies -- NRA, WPA, AAA, CCC -- were an attempt to politicize the economy through statist central planning. Many of these state-run agencies were declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. But the proof of the pudding is in the eating and the eating was economically unhealthy.

According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics between 1931 and 1940 the average unemployment rate was 18.8 percent. As late as 1939, unemployment was still 17.2 percent. Not until World War II production geared up -- along with new pro-business policies -- did unemployment drop sharply. This is why I do not want a new New Deal or a new Gosplan. Free market capitalism will empower the Gulf Coast to rapid recovery. State planning will merely prolong the misery.

9.07.2005

Tonight's Lineup

On CNBC's "Kudlow & Company" tonight:

Senator Judd Gregg to discuss the affect of Katrina on the federal budget.

Red Cavaney, president of the American Petroleum Institute, to talk about oil prices, price gouging, and his testimony today before the House Energy and Commerce Committee.

Al Hubbard, director of the National Economic Council, on Katrina and the government relief efforts.

Jim Goldman, reporter for CNBC, to talk about Apple's new IPOD/cellphone

Wharton Professor Jeremy Siegel to give us a market outlook.

9.06.2005

Tonight's Lineup

On CNBC's "Kudlow & Company" tonight:

Senator Jon Kyl on the new Senate agenda and Katrina efforts

Congressman Steve Pearce on suspending the 18 cents federal gas tax

Joe Kilduff, energy analyst with Fimat USA and Chris Edmonds, Director of Research at Pritchard Capital Partners (New Orleans-based energy investment firm) to talk about oil.

Robert McTeer, former Dallas Fed president, to talk about interest rates and the Fed.

Market discussion with Morris Mark, Mark Asset Management, and Frank Gannon, AIG Sun America Asset Management.

Not That 70's Show

The story of Hurricane Katrina is first and foremost a tale of the wrath of Mother Nature and the resulting human misery: thousands of deaths, destroyed homes and businesses, family break-ups, psychological demoralization, and other hardships too painful to recount. But Katrina is also an economic story in terms of its impact on U.S. commerce, trade, energy, shipping, and overall growth. Here the doomsayers and pessimists are once again going to be proven wrong. This is not the 1970s.

After more than twenty years of deregulation the U.S. economy is flexible and resilient -- even in the face of short-run shocks.

Consider the supply-shortage impact of damaged oil rigs in the Gulf of Mexico, the loss of power to fuel them, and the resulting spikes in motorist gasoline prices. In the 1970s government-applied price controls and supply rationing created a dysfunctional economy that looked like a pinball machine on permanent tilt. Today, with few exceptions, price controls have been rejected. Auto and truck drivers would rather pay $4 a gallon for gas they can get, than have government mandate $2 a gallon for gas that’s not available.

In most cases market forces in the post-Reagan period still triumph over central planning. Deregulatory actions on fuel emissions and releases from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve have already helped oil and gas prices come way down after the initial Katrina spike. Congress is removing obstacles to energy production, including off-shore operations. Some policymakers are even talking about abolishing the federal gas tax -- a good idea.

Supply-side tax incentives are another anti-70s theme. Even before OPEC declared war in the 1970s, high marginal tax rates stifled entrepreneurship and growth. Today those rates are much lower, with President George W. Bush contributing by reducing the tax rate on investment variables like dividends and capital gains to only 15 percent. Whereas the 1970s had a stagflation/recession bias, today’s new economy has a growth bias that supports market-oriented resiliency and flexibility.

Then there’s price stability. The dreaded oil spikes of the 1970s merely piled on to the easy-money soft-dollar management of the Arthur Burns/G. William Miller Federal Reserve. In the ensuing decades Paul Volker and Alan Greenspan moved us back to pro-growth price stability.

In fact, the economy going into the Katrina shock is very healthy. Last week we had another strong jobs report, with unemployment declining to 4.9 percent. Employment in the U.S. stands at a record 134 million business payrolls and 142 million people working. Unlike the 1970s, when real profits were declining, American business today is highly profitable, registering huge productivity gains with enormous cash on hand. That’s why stock prices actually [ITAL] increased [UNITAL] during the Katrina breakout, a market signal of confidence in the economy’s future outlook.

Political demagogues like Sen. Hillary Clinton accuse oil companies of price gouging and excess profiteering. But the reality is that America’s great energy firms are risking life and limb to find lost workers and re-house employees so that refining rigs can be restarted and American families and businesses can get back on the road. As of this writing, half of the damaged refineries are back in action. That includes names like Valero, Marathon Oil, and Motiva, even while Chevron, ConocoPhillips, and Exxon Mobil struggle to get their operations up and going in the near term.

In a week’s time, the Louisiana Offshore Oil Port moved back to 75 percent capacity, as did the Colonial pipeline. Shell’s Capline system and the Plantation pipeline are almost back to capacity. These are remarkable achievements. Our energy companies should be praised by the public, not sullied by cheap-shot politicians. Widely predicted gas shortages never materialized during one of the biggest driving weekends of the year.

As for the GDP story, the near shutdown of the Louisiana and Mississippi economies in September may cause a loss of 1 percent growth in the third quarter. Instead of 3.5 percent growth, look for 2.5 percent and a temporary rise in the unemployment rate. But as the rebuilding and reconstruction proceed, growth should return to a solid 3 percent trendline -- perhaps as early as the fourth quarter and certainly by next year’s first half.

Transportation in the Gulf Coast will be rerouted to Jacksonville, Florida, and points north. Energy slack will be picked up by Houston. Shipping and trade will swing over to the Port of Miami. Think market resiliency and flexibility coupled with economic incentives, and glued together by our remarkable information- and communications-technology systems. Even a temporary $100 billion economic loss will not stop American free enterprise from moving forward.

It’s all we can hope for and more. Perhaps our economic success will help relieve the demoralization and misery left in Mother Nature’s wake. But one thing is for sure: Ours is a wealth-creating, opportunity-opening economy that does not teeter on the edge of destruction. We will move to new higher ground before long.

9.01.2005

More On Katrina

Two excellent columns: Peggy Noonan's and Jim Glassman's. Check them out.