With all the loony left charges of US military mistreatment of Gitmo prisoners, where is the outrage over the Sunday NY Times story by Sabrina Tavernise about Iraqi terrorist insurgent acts of prisoner brutality in numerous torture houses found in that country: floggings, electroshock torture, strangulation, starving, dehydration, beatings, and outright murders. Evidence of all of these was uncovered last Friday by Marines in the town of Karabila.
Contrast this with Mark Steyn’s
column today in the New York Sun, which should provide some necessary and important perspective on Gitmo. As should the recent remarks of Rep. Duncan Hunter, head of the Armed Services Committee. Obviously, there have been problems. After all, it’s a prison operated during wartime. But that does not justify the rhetoric used by Amnesty International and Sen. Dick Durbin. Gitmo is not a gulag; our soldiers are not Nazis or Khmer Rouge. As Steyn points out, 15-30 million died in the gulags, 9 million died in the concentration camps, and 2 million died at the hands of Pol Pot. This is to say nothing of the massive death toll the prisons of Mao Tse Tung took. But no-one has died in Gitmo.
Steyn points out that camp guards handle copies of the Koran only when wearing gloves. That the average detainee gains 13 pounds during his stay. That ‘"mustard-baked dill fish", "baked Tandoori chicken breast" and other delicacies’ make up the menu. Add this to the fact that a many of the non-high-security prisoners are permitted to watch TV, play soccer, and spend as much as half their day outside. Gitmo sounds, at times, more like a summer camp than a prison.
In light of these facts, it’s impossible to see Amnesty’s or Durbin’s rhetoric as anything other than the worst, most morally suspect kind of opportunism and Anti-American posturing. It’s hard to say which is worse, in fact – that Dick Durbin is slandering the military of his own country, or that Amnesty International is betraying its legacy of real work to help liberate and improve conditions for prisoners of conscience everywhere. (It’s important to remember, by the way, that a prisoner of conscience does NOT use violence – he is a prisoner solely for his beliefs and nothing more. Terrorists or guerillas who have participated in attempts to bring about the violent destruction of the United States do not fall into this category.)
Allegations of abuse must always be taken seriously. America must hold itself to a higher standard than other countries. Even though we treat our prisoners better than the Iraqi insurgents treat theirs – they maim, starve, and kill them, and certainly do not provide them with copies of the Bible-- we can’t become complacent. And we certainly can’t justify any breakdowns in discipline which led to possible mistreatment of prisoners. But to compare our military to Hitler’s, and to compare Guantanamo, which holds fewer than 1000 prisoners (1000!) with Stalin’s gulags, which held 2 million at any one time, is inexcusable. We’re fighting a war to spread democracy and freedom. And our military deserves much better than that. As does our President. And our nation.